Do you need vetted tech talent fast without top‑tier pricing? Here we explore the best Toptal alternatives like CloudDevs, Gigster, LatHire and more diving into each of these Toptal competitors, and also looking into the recent Toptal controversy that’s being talked about.
Best Toptal Alternatives:
Let’s talk top-quality tech talent, and where smart startups are hiring them in 2025.
If you’ve spent time hunting for quality developers, you’ve undoubtedly heard of Toptal, and you’re probably aware its premium pricing caters mostly to enterprise‑level clients. So if you need vetted talent quickly but must stick to a budget, you’ll be relieved to know there are strong Toptal alternatives out there.
Toptal promises access to an elite “top 3%” talent pool, offering pre-vetted tech professionals and a short trial period. However, its $500 upfront deposit (for your first hire) and high hourly rates can be a major deterrent. On top of that, Toptal charges a $79 monthly subscription fee just to access its platform.
When it comes to actual developer rates, you can expect to pay upwards of $100 per hour. This includes the individual developer’s rate, plus a 40% to 50% commission that Toptal takes as its cut.
Despite Toptal’s claim of housing the “top 3%” of tech talent, a growing chorus of freelancers and hiring managers say the reality falls short. On forums like Reddit and Hacker News, contractors decry a screening process that drags on for weeks, only to end in unexpected suspensions or pressure to slash their rates. Meanwhile, clients have taken Toptal to the BBB, citing missed deadlines, subpar work, and the very opposite of the seamless, high‑caliber experience they were sold.
Adding insult to injury, Toptal has leaned on aggressive legal tactics to protect its turf. In 2021 it sued Andela over alleged trade‑secret misappropriation, and more recently it threatened to sue CloudDevs, Toptal’s closest competitor, simply for pointing out Toptal’s cost‑effective alternatives!
Far from quieting critics, those actions sparked a virality boom for rival platforms, underscoring that heavy‑handed litigation can backfire, and reinforcing CloudDevs’ reputation as the smart, straightforward choice.
CloudDevs is a specialized network of Latin American developers and designers. They boast being “the largest talent platform in Latin America” with over 500,000 pre-vetted engineers and designers. If you’re happy hiring people in similar time zones, CloudDevs can fill roles in as little as 24 hours, thanks to its rapid matching process. In practice, you interview a CloudDevs-recommended candidate within a day or two, and their contracts are rolling weekly.
○ Speed: They emphasize lightning-fast matches, devs are “assigned in 24 hours” after you give them specs. This can beat Toptal’s usual 1–2 week matching time.
○ Vetting and Quality: Every candidate passes a technical and communication assessment plus a live coding test (monitored for plagiarism). In short, you get senior engineers and designers whose English and tech chops are already checked.
○ Cost Savings: Latin American devs typically cost much less than U.S. rates. CloudDevs says its talent is often “60% less” expensive than U.S. counterparts. In numbers, senior CloudDevs engineers often bill around $45–$75/hr (versus $100–200+ on top-tier U.S. platforms).
○ Time-zone Alignment: By focusing on LATAM, CloudDevs ensures a strong overlap with U.S. work hours. This makes real-time collaboration easier than hiring from Europe or Asia.
○ No Minimum/Cancel Anytime: Contracts are “pay-as-you-go, rolling weekly, no minimum commitment”. You can cancel or replace a hire at any time; they even offer a 7-day trial where you can swap out the developer or get a refund if needed.
○ Latin America Only: By design, CloudDevs only covers LatAm countries. If you need talent outside that region, they’re not a fit.
○ Tech-Heavy Focus: They cover developers (full-stack, front-end, back-end, AI/ML, mobile) and UI/UX designers, but don’t handle non-tech roles like marketing or finance. (For HR, sales, or generalist roles, see Lathire below.)
In our experience, CloudDevs feels like a faster, lower-cost Toptal for startups that are OK with a Latin American team. You still get a curated shortlist, but at rates closer to mid-level contractors. As one reviewer noted, clients can get “talent assigned in 24 hours,” which is a boon when you need dev work started yesterday.
Lathire is another U.S. to LATAM matchmaking platform, but it covers a broader range of roles. Like CloudDevs, Lathire specializes in Latin American talent, but it also includes generalist and non-tech positions (sales, marketing, HR, etc.) in addition to developers and designers. They use a mix of AI algorithms and human vetting to build shortlists from their 800,000+ member network.
Lathire’s pitch: you can hire “top tech and generalist talent from Latin America’s largest talent platform” for roughly 80% less than U.S. salary equivalents. They claim a matching time of 24 hours as well, leveraging AI-driven resume screening and skill assessments to filter candidates. Their site highlights saving “100+ hours on hiring” and cutting costs “in half” (up to 80% on non-tech hires, ~60% on tech).
○ Huge Talent Pool: With 800k+ candidates, Lathire covers a wide array of skills and roles. They explicitly list fields like development, UX/design, marketing, operations, and even HR/recruiting. For example, you’ll find UI/UX designers, project managers, salespeople, etc. in their marketplace.
○ Extensive Vetting: They call themselves “AI-powered” but still have human recruiters vet each candidate. Only about top 3% of applicants make it through. Profiles include skill ratings and background checks. You get curated shortlists with in-depth profiles, not random bids.
○ Quick Matching: Like CloudDevs, Lathire promises to “match within 24 hrs”. In practice, it means an AI shortlisting tool and recruiter should hand you candidate(s) fast.
○ Cost Advantages: Again, the figures are eye-opening: “slash hiring costs in half” and save “up to 80% on salaries for generalist hires”. This can make a huge difference for startups funding new hires.
○ Full-service HR Support: Lathire actually handles payroll, compliance, and legal for you. They tout “full-service hiring solutions,” so once you pick someone, they manage everything from contracts to payroll. That can save time for busy founders.
○ LATAM Focus Again: As with CloudDevs, candidates are all in Latin America. That’s by design, but worth noting if you need, say, an Australian dev or a U.S. localized team.
In short, Lathire is like a larger, AI-boosted cousin of CloudDevs. It offers similarly vetted LATAM talent plus a broader talent mix. It’s a strong choice if you want the cost savings of LATAM hires but also need, say, a remote PM or marketing lead along with your engineers. Their AI/consultant combo means you’re not slogging through search results, they do the heavy lifting and present you with a shortlist.
Upwork is the “big fish” of freelancing platforms, with 12+ million freelancers and 5+ million clients worldwide. Unlike CloudDevs or Lathire, Upwork is not a curated network; it’s an open marketplace where anyone can sign up as a developer, designer, project manager, or whatever. This makes Upwork extremely flexible, but also means you (the employer) must do the vetting.
○ Enormous Talent Pool: No niche or skill is missing on Upwork. Need a Unity VR dev, an Arabic translator, or a PHP guru? You’ll find them. Upwork’s sheer size means extremely quick posting and bidding.
○ Any Role, Any Budget: You can hire hourly or fixed-price; budgets range from <$5/hr (for beginners) up to $150+/hr for senior talent. The bidding system lets you negotiate directly with freelancers.
○ User Reviews & Ratings: Upwork’s profile system lets you see portfolio, client feedback, and success scores. This helps filter candidates. (It’s still buyer-beware, but at least there are stars and testimonials.)
○ Low Overhead for Clients: Posting a job is free, and Upwork charges only a 3% processing fee on payments. (In contrast, Toptal charges a 30–50% markup on developer rates.) There’s no mandatory deposit.
○ Payment Protection: Upwork escrows funds and only releases payment for approved work (for hourly contracts they have a detailed time-tracking system). This offers some safety for the buyer.
○ No Pre-Screening: Remember, anyone can join Upwork. There’s no central vetting at sign-up. That means your process becomes: post a job, sift through dozens of bids, interview, and hope you chose well. In practice, this can eat a lot of time. As one reviewer put it, Upwork is the “freelancing wild west” due to this lack of vetting.
○ Variable Quality: Because of the open nature, you’ll see both seasoned pros and bargain-basement newbies. As a rule of thumb (and Upwork alt comparison), “lower pay rates mean lower quality”. Top-tier developers exist on Upwork, but they’re mixed in with less-experienced freelancers.
○ Freelancer Fees: Upwork’s client fee is small, but freelancers pay up to 20% on their earnings (first $500 with a client). This sometimes drives away the absolute top talent.
○ Time Investment: If you’re not careful, hiring on Upwork can take days/weeks of posting, interviewing, and testing candidates. (However, for larger long-term projects it can be worth it.)
Bottom line: Upwork is a great fallback option when you have a well-scoped task and time to vet. For a quick prototype or fixed-scope job (e.g. “build a landing page”), it can be cost-effective. Many small startups use Upwork to hire designers, QA testers, or junior devs on tight budgets. Just be prepared to do the legwork. As one summary noted, Upwork is the “golden mean” of freelance marketplaces: it’s not niche-vetted like Toptal, but it’s incredibly flexible and big.
Fiverr is famous for its $5-and-up gigs, mostly quick tasks in design, writing, marketing, and also small-scale dev work. In recent years they launched Fiverr Pro, a vetted tier for “clients with higher expectations and budgets”. In essence, Fiverr Pro tries to be an upmarket boutique within the gig economy.
○ Quick, Fixed-Price Gigs: Fiverr is great if you know exactly what you need. Need a logo, a 500-word blog post, or a small WordPress tweak? There are hundreds of “gigs” ready.
○ Fiverr Pro Option: Pro freelancers are pre-approved, supposedly only the top ~3%–7% who pass Fiverr’s screening. If you need a higher-quality dev or designer for a well-defined task, Fiverr Pro might work.
○ Flexible Scope: You can find both one-off gigs and larger monthly packages. Many professionals on Fiverr offer ongoing services for a fixed monthly fee.
○ Very Low Entry Cost: Even Pro gigs can be surprisingly affordable, especially compared to Toptal. You can hire a fairly experienced WordPress dev on Fiverr for a few hundred dollars per month, whereas that might cost much more on Toptal.
○ Pay-to-Play and High Fees: Fiverr takes up to 20% of the transaction. This means sellers often inflate their prices, or bargain talent may drop off the platform. The high fee is one reason quality can be uneven.
○ Quality Is Hit-or-Miss: For basic Fiverr (non-Pro), anyone can list gigs, and many are entry-level or hobbyists. Even Pro-level quality varies by category. You’ll want to scrutinize portfolios carefully.
○ Project Size Limits: Fiverr is optimized for relatively small, discrete tasks. It’s less suitable for multi-month projects or complex products. (If you try a big project, you may end up juggling multiple gig orders.)
○ Less Collaboration: Communication can be more transactional. You generally message through Fiverr’s interface and might not get the same ongoing collaboration experience as a dedicated freelance hire or agency.
In short, Fiverr can be a useful alternative if you have well-defined tasks like “develop this landing page” or “design these 5 icons.” The platform is largely oriented to developers and designers, but also has writers, marketers, etc. If you try Fiverr, use Pro for anything mission-critical (noting that even Pro has its pitfalls). As one analysis put it, Fiverr is essentially an open marketplace with an upmarket Pro section, it won’t replace Toptal’s hands-on vetting, but can save you cash on short tasks.
Freelancer.com is Upwork’s closest competitor. It similarly offers a giant pool of global freelancers across every skill, including developers, designers, marketers, and more. It also uses a bidding system (you post a job, freelancers bid), as well as contests for designers.
○ Large Global Network: Freelancer claims millions of users worldwide. It’s one of the oldest freelance sites. You can post unlimited jobs and get bids quickly.
○ Lower Freelancer Fees: Freelancer charges only 10% commission on fixed-price projects (10% or $5, whichever is higher), which undercuts Upwork’s 20% on the first $500. This can attract workers who are price-sensitive.
○ Wide Range of Services: Like Upwork, it’s not just tech, you’ll find accountants, translators, and even voice actors. For design-heavy roles or odd jobs, it’s a broad marketplace.
● Cons:
○ Open Marketplace Drawbacks: It suffers from the same “anyone can apply” issue as Upwork. Many freelancers bid low, and you have to vet resumes. Quality varies widely.
○ Platform Fees and Extras: Freelancer.com can nickel-and-dime you with bidding “connects,” featured listings, and contests. Be prepared for some spammy bidding.
○ Communication and Support: The interface is not as streamlined as Upwork, and there can be lags in support or disputes.
Freelancer.com is essentially a slower, less-refined version of Upwork. It can be cheaper if you exploit the lower fees (but note: Upwork has a better reputation and polishing). In my experience, we’ve used Upwork and Freelancer interchangeably, both require rigorous vetting, and both have lots of entry-level bidders. If Upwork doesn’t pan out or if you hit an Upwork hiring limit, Freelancer.com is the obvious alternative. Just remember the same caveat: “cheaper usually means lower quality”.
Gigster is very different from the above. Think of Gigster as a boutique development agency rather than a freelancer marketplace. You describe your project, and Gigster assembles a whole team (developers + designer + project manager) to deliver it. They even use AI to help assemble teams.
○ Done-for-You Teams: You don’t have to vet or manage freelancers. Gigster provides a project manager (your single point of contact) who coordinates a dev team for you. This is much closer to hiring an agency than posting a gig.
○ High-Caliber Talent: Gigster advertises that it only takes the top ~7% of applicants. Many of its engineers come from big tech companies. You’re essentially outsourcing the entire dev work.
○ Structured Process: Because you get a full team, they handle architecture, testing, and deployment. If you need a startup MVP or a product built from scratch without in-house tech staff, Gigster can deliver the whole package.
○ Very High Cost: Gigster’s pricing is per-project and carries a huge minimum. Expect >$50,000+ for even a small project. (Some sources say $52k+ as a starting point.) That’s more like hiring an agency or a mini-dev-shop.
○ Not for Small Tasks: Because of the project model, it’s overkill for one-off fixes or minor features. If your budget is in the low thousands, Gigster is out.
○ Long Lead Time: Even though they promise quick staffing (they say you can get going in 1–3 weeks), in practice assembling a whole team can take time. If you want immediate hands-on-keyboard help, Gigster is slower than a single freelancer.
○ No Free Trial/Refund: Gigster has no low-risk trial, once you agree on a project plan, you pay for it. That’s a sharp contrast with some others that offer trial periods.
Gigster makes sense for larger, well-funded tech projects: think enterprise apps, mobile apps, or full-product builds where you’d otherwise hire (and manage) a team yourself. It’s essentially outsourcing your CTO and engineering team. For most early-stage startups, the cost is prohibitive. But if your needs are exactly a turnkey dev team and budget is secondary, Gigster can deliver quickly with guaranteed project management.
Arc.dev is a curated engineering marketplace aimed squarely at software development. It’s similar in spirit to Toptal: you fill out requirements, discuss with an Arc consultant, and they hand-select a few candidates for you to interview.
○ Top-Tier Vetting: Arc runs a rigorous six-step screening and claims only about 1.1% of applicants are accepted. In practice, Arc engineers tend to be very experienced, often with strong English skills and many years in the industry.
○ High Touch Matching: Like Toptal, you get a consultant who learns your needs and shortlists developers. This means you’re less likely to be inundated with irrelevant resumes.
○ Fast Hiring: Arc advertises 24–72 hour matching. Because it’s niche and small, they can indeed get candidates to you in a day or two.
○ Flexible Engagements: You can hire hourly, on retainer, or full-time. Arc even offers trial periods (two weeks for hourly/retainer; three months risk-free for full-time hires). If it doesn’t work out, you get a replacement or refund.
○ Exclusive Developer Pool: Because of the vetting, Arc has fewer engineers than Upwork, but the trade-off is quality. All Arc freelancers are expected to be top-notch coders, and many have senior-level experience.
○ High Cost: Arc’s rates are comparable to Toptal. You’ll generally pay in the ballpark of $80–150+/hr for developers. (It’s a premium service.)
○ Limited Scope: Arc is purely software engineering. If you need a designer or non-tech staff, they won’t help.
○ Small Pool: Because of its screening, Arc’s available candidates at any moment is relatively small. If your needs are obscure or local (e.g. needing someone legally in a certain country), it might take longer.
In short, Arc.dev is essentially a high-end alternative to Toptal. It matches startups with pre-vetted senior devs from around the world. Its unique selling point is very strict vetting (even tougher than Toptal’s 3%). If your priority is quality of developer and you’re willing to pay for it, Arc could be an excellent choice. A well-known site confirms Arc’s approach: “a six-step screening process with a 1.1% pass rate” for developers. For many CTOs, Arc hits the sweet spot of quick matching and trustworthiness, albeit at a premium.
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Each platform above has its sweet spot:
Ultimately, the “best alternative” depends on your priorities. Do you value speed? (CloudDevs, Lathire claim 24h matches.) Afterall, CloudDevs is the best Toptal alternative in the market. LatHire closely follows as the second best Toptal alternative around. Is budget your concern? (Fiverr, Freelancer are cheapest, though with more work from you as they are non-vetted talents) Quality? (CloudDevs, LatHire, Arc and Gigster vet intensely.) As one analysis sums up: there’s a spectrum from open marketplaces like Upwork and Fiverr (low price, high self-vetting) to boutique platforms like Arc and Gigster (high price, hands-off quality).
I recommend weighing the trade-offs: platforms like CloudDevs and Lathire offer a middle ground with both vetting and cost-saving, which is why they’ve become attractive to many startups. On the other hand, Upwork/Freelancer give you maximum choice if you have the time to sort through it.
Whatever you pick, know that you do have options beyond Toptal, and many of them can deliver great results for a fraction of the cost
Be the first to post comment!
